PUBLIC MARKS with tag harmful

Simon St. Laurent on the process forging HTML5:

HTML5 will be damaged, its credibility weakened, but will still be important, one way or another.

Yeah, I sure wish HTML5 were going more like, say, the W3C’s XHTML 2.0 spec. That worked out great.

Update: Mark Pilgrim says to look at primary sources.

Gruber nous rappelle que le fanboyzisme liquéfie le cerveau, et Pilgrim que l'Atomicité détruit la probité. Ils font la paire.

Mettre l'adresse d'une mailing-list en adresse de réponse systématique est vraiment une très mauvaise idée !

People still using these two documents to debate the issue are wasting everybody's time. The issue was definitively settled in 2001, and Chip won.

While the message is being processed, the list administrator might take advantage of the opportunity to munge some of the message headers. Many list administrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation is also one

org.apache.ws.commons.axiom axiom-api ${axiom.version}

org.apache.ws.commons.axiom axiom-impl ${axiom.version}

Voilà pourquoi il faut haïr Maven.

Some forms of header munging are helpful, such as special loop-detection headers. Others are questionable. Most are ill-advised or dangerous. Many list adminstrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation also is one of the most ill-advised.