public marks

PUBLIC MARKS with tags harmful & mail

2008

List Reply-To considered harmful

by nhoizey
Mettre l'adresse d'une mailing-list en adresse de réponse systématique est vraiment une très mauvaise idée !

"Reply-To" Munging Still Considered Harmful. Really.

by nhoizey
People still using these two documents to debate the issue are wasting everybody's time. The issue was definitively settled in 2001, and Chip won.

MetaSystema.Net: Reply-To Munging Considered Useful

by nhoizey & 1 other
While the message is being processed, the list administrator might take advantage of the opportunity to munge some of the message headers. Many list administrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation is also one

2005

"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful

by nhoizey & 2 others (via)
Some forms of header munging are helpful, such as special loop-detection headers. Others are questionable. Most are ill-advised or dangerous. Many list adminstrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation also is one of the most ill-advised.

PUBLIC TAGS related to tag harmful

débat +   gp:links +   header +   list +   mail +   mailing-list +   mailman +   munge +   reply +   reply-to +   RFC-822 +   useful +  

Active users

nhoizey
last mark : 10/06/2008 09:15