2005
Design for Confusion - New York Times
by multilinko
You might have thought that a strategy of creating doubt about inconvenient research results could work only in soft fields like economics. But it turns out that the strategy works equally well when deployed against the hard sciences.
The most spectacular example is the campaign to discredit research on global warming. Despite an overwhelming scientific consensus, many people have the impression that the issue is still unresolved. This impression reflects the assiduous work of conservative think tanks, which produce and promote skeptical reports that look like peer-reviewed research, but aren't. And behind it all lies lavish financing from the energy industry, especially ExxonMobil.
There are several reasons why fake research is so effective. One is that nonscientists sometimes find it hard to tell the difference between research and advocacy - if it's got numbers and charts in it, doesn't that make it science?
Even when reporters do know the difference, the conventions of he-said-she-said journalism get in the way of conveying that knowledge to readers.
Suspended Animation Induced in Mice ■ Gizmodo
by wyliej
the process transformed the mouse from a warm-blooded creature to a cold-blooded one
Collected Advice on Research and Writing
by rjjjsp
A collection of advice about how to do research and how to communicate effectively (primarily for computer scientists).
