Sponsorised links
26 June 2006
Review of the Year's Best Web 2.0 Explanations (web2.wsj2.com)
I'd like to end things with a roll-up of all this year's Web 2.0 discussions and explanation. I know that many people are still struggling with what Web 2.0 means, are often confused by thinking it's purely a marketing term, or if you're like most folks, you haven't really heard about it yet. To those, I think this list will definitely help. And it's a good refresher for all of us Web 2.0 followers as well.
24 June 2006
D is for Dotcom - Darwin Online
What were we thinking? And how can we avoid thinking like that again?
Time for Web 2.0 to get real | ZDNet.com
What Tom and many others discovered to their cost was a fundamental flaw in the Web 2.0 era: a complete disregard for accountability to their users among service providers.
» Digg users spurred to register and contribute | ZDNet.com
My story yesterday, “Digg’s 8 million “social freeloaders”, in which I discuss the Social Web’s very low user contribution ratio, has spurred passive Digg readers to become active Digg contributors!
Web 2.0 Business Models - TECHNOSIGHT
Today’s Web startups are not entirely unlike their dot.com predecessors when it comes to the way they are thinking about making money. The differences for “Web 2.0″ type companies stem not from their preferred business models - models that are very similar to their dot.com counterparts - but in the forces influencing the implementation of those models.
Sponsorised links
19 June 2006
adaptive path » the web 2.0 experience continuum
There’s been a lot of talk about the technology of Web 2.0, but only a little about the impact these technologies will have on user experience. Everyone wants to tell you what Web 2.0 means, but how will it feel? What will it be like for users?
