PUBLIC MARKS with search accepting

The rich, collaborative web applications being developed on the NASA Apps platform are built on the open-source Django Web Application Framework. This portal provides source code repositories, bug tracking and AGILE project management systems, and public-facing wikis for each project within NASA Apps.

These projects, while intended to be released as open source software, have not currently passed through the NASA software release process. It is anticipated that they will be released under the NASA Open Source Agreement (NOSA), and will be accepting user community contributions by the end of the summer.

So I’ve tended to be plain accepting that HTML 5 will be whatever it is, and if its bad its bad because of Hickson and a certain crowd. I have no power to affect the obsessive thoughts of certain individuals one way or the other. I’m also probably representative of quite a large group of the silent disenchanted who will continue to code in HTML 4 or XHTML 1 well into the future and fight on building websites in whatever tag soup monstrosity we are burdened with on the day.

HTML 5 est "community driven", ce qui concrètement signifie que seuls ceux qui ont la capacité de travailler à plein temps dessus ont une petite chance de faire entendre une voix différente de la WTF. Mais de toute façon, vu comme c'est parti, HTML 5 finira en browser-sniffing (ou "feature detection" comme on dit aujourd'hui), ce qui en fait déjà un échec immense.

In this scenario, our local watercoolr service acts as a PubSub server, accepting requests to create custom channels, maintaining a subscriber list, and pushing out notifications when an update arrives at the channel.

The HDMA is excited to announce that we will be publishing a collection of hand drawn maps with Princeton Architectural Press. To celebrate and help collect interesting maps for possible inclusion in our upcoming book, we will be running a contest over the next few months.

Probably the best-known strictness disaster is HTML. […]

Some people argue that HTML is commonly used because it’s not strict. That the non-strictness of its design makes it popular. That if web browsers had always just thrown an error instead of accepting invalid HTML, somehow people would not have used HTML. That is a patently ridiculous argument.

Open wisdom-of-crowds software movements have become influential, but they haven’t promoted the kind of radical creativity I love most in computer science. If anything, they’ve been hindrances. Some of the youngest, brightest minds have been trapped in a 1970s intellectual framework because they are hypnotized into accepting old software designs as if they were facts of nature.

Even though the open-source movement has a stinging countercultural rhetoric, it has in practice been a conservative force.

So science as it is already practiced is open, but in a punctuated way, not a continuous way. The interval of nonopenness—the time before publication—functions like the walls of a cell. It allows a complicated stream of elements to be defined well enough to be explored, tested, and then improved.