<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/night.kame/marks/tag/confiance,wikipedia">
<title>Public marks from user night.kame with tags confiance &amp; wikipedia</title>
<description>Public marks from user night.kame with tags confiance &amp; wikipedia</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/user/night.kame/marks/tag/confiance,wikipedia</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/night.kame/mark/1057974385"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/night.kame/mark/1057974385">
<title>By the numbers. And what do they mean for our industry | Monday Note</title>
<link>http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=920</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;One big difference: on Wiki the new, corrected edition, is just minutes away. What it means: the idea of full-of-crap wiki systems is dead. Fact is: due to its contributive structure, Wikipedia is a fairly accurate tool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Faut pas pousser mémé dans les orties non plus. Tout ce que cela signifie est que Wikipedia est aussi précis que le dernier admin qui aura bloqué la page pendant une guerre d'édition. La seule conclusion à en tirer est qu'on ne devrait jamais lire une page Wikipédia sans lire la page de discussion associée.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<dc:date>2008-09-07T19:29:27Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>night.kame</dc:author>
<dc:subject>confiance, wikipedia</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=920"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2008/09/21/b40ff4c328bc92024cfaf7c3b74d7a0d.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.mondaynote.com/?p=920">By the numbers. And what do they mean for our industry | Monday Note</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/night.kame">night.kame</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2892224">1 other(s)</a> 
<div class="description"><blockquote><p>One big difference: on Wiki the new, corrected edition, is just minutes away. What it means: the idea of full-of-crap wiki systems is dead. Fact is: due to its contributive structure, Wikipedia is a fairly accurate tool.</p></blockquote><p>Faut pas pousser mémé dans les orties non plus. Tout ce que cela signifie est que Wikipedia est aussi précis que le dernier admin qui aura bloqué la page pendant une guerre d'édition. La seule conclusion à en tirer est qu'on ne devrait jamais lire une page Wikipédia sans lire la page de discussion associée.</p></div>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/confiance">confiance</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/wikipedia">wikipedia</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057974385">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2892224">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>