<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/kasi77/marks/tag/web2.0,internet">
<title>Public marks from user kasi77 with tags web2.0 &amp; internet</title>
<description>Public marks from user kasi77 with tags web2.0 &amp; internet</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/user/kasi77/marks/tag/web2.0,internet</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/kasi77/mark/574954"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/kasi77/mark/574954">
<title>Boing Boing: Can anyone own &quot;Web 2.0?&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/26/can_anyone_own_web_2.html</link>
<description>O'Reilly maintains that Web 2.0 is a service mark of their company when applied to conferences, and that other conferences that want to call themselves &quot;Web 2.0&quot; will have to get O'Reilly's permission -- they defend this as part of the sound business practice of defending a trademark.</description>
<dc:date>2006-05-28T11:19:35Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>kasi77</dc:author>
<dc:subject>web 2.0, groupe:clever-age, web2.0, internet, web</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/26/can_anyone_own_web_2.html"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/05/28/bd952d9d8b5272fcce8b518478f705e6.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/26/can_anyone_own_web_2.html">Boing Boing: Can anyone own &quot;Web 2.0?&quot;</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/kasi77">kasi77</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/880579">1 other(s)</a> 
<p class="description">O'Reilly maintains that Web 2.0 is a service mark of their company when applied to conferences, and that other conferences that want to call themselves "Web 2.0" will have to get O'Reilly's permission -- they defend this as part of the sound business practice of defending a trademark.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/web%2B2.0">web 2.0</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/groupe%253Aclever-age">groupe:clever-age</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/web2.0">web2.0</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/internet">internet</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/web">web</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=574954">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/880579">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>