<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/tag/uranium">
<title>Public marks with tag uranium</title>
<description>Public marks with tag uranium</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/uranium</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/hugues/mark/1058176154"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/_Oni_/mark/1057595521"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/RacefanPat/mark/1663467"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/fxlacroix/mark/112051"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/hugues/mark/1058176154">
<title>Mines d'uranium - Accueil - IRSN</title>
<link>http://www.irsn.org/index.php?position=mines_uranium_accueil</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2009-01-29T18:03:47Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>hugues</dc:author>
<dc:subject>uranium, nucléaire, sites miniers, déchets, déchets nucléaires, radioactif, radioactivité, cogema</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.irsn.org/index.php?position=mines_uranium_accueil"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2009/01/29/184769b02d29f02d0d018d3db5e44788.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.irsn.org/index.php?position=mines_uranium_accueil">Mines d'uranium - Accueil - IRSN</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/hugues">hugues</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/uranium">uranium</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/nucl%25C3%25A9aire">nucléaire</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/sites%2Bminiers">sites miniers</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/d%25C3%25A9chets">déchets</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/d%25C3%25A9chets%2Bnucl%25C3%25A9aires">déchets nucléaires</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/radioactif">radioactif</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/radioactivit%25C3%25A9">radioactivité</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/cogema">cogema</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1058176154">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3070024">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/_Oni_/mark/1057595521">
<title>Amazon.com: Uranium Ore: Everything Else</title>
<link>http://www.amazon.com/Uranium-Ore/dp/B000796XXM</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2007-12-06T11:57:16Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>_Oni_</dc:author>
<dc:subject>uranium</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Uranium-Ore/dp/B000796XXM"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2007/12/06/ccc750f399ec135402037a6979ca5a73.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.amazon.com/Uranium-Ore/dp/B000796XXM">Amazon.com: Uranium Ore: Everything Else</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/_Oni_">_Oni_</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2577639">1 other(s)</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/uranium">uranium</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057595521">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2577639">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/RacefanPat/mark/1663467">
<title>Gov. Inquiry to urge backdown?</title>
<link>http://racefansramblings.wordpress.com/2006/12/04/gov-inquiry-to-urge-backdown/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2006-12-03T17:58:03Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>RacefanPat</dc:author>
<dc:subject>debate, mining, nuclear, uranium</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://racefansramblings.wordpress.com/2006/12/04/gov-inquiry-to-urge-backdown/"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://racefansramblings.wordpress.com/2006/12/04/gov-inquiry-to-urge-backdown/">Gov. Inquiry to urge backdown?</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/RacefanPat">RacefanPat</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/debate">debate</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/mining">mining</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/nuclear">nuclear</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/uranium">uranium</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1663467">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1457401">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/fxlacroix/mark/112051">
<title>ALTERNATIVE ENERGY BLOG - Solar-Energy-Wind-Power.com: Only 85 years of Uranium Supplies?</title>
<link>http://alt-e.blogspot.com/2005/06/only-85-years-of-uranium-supplies.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2005-07-12T10:33:21Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>fxlacroix</dc:author>
<dc:subject>actualités, themas, energies, uranium</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://alt-e.blogspot.com/2005/06/only-85-years-of-uranium-supplies.html"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2005/06/30/8842038e03176c0a0bce116be3451721.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://alt-e.blogspot.com/2005/06/only-85-years-of-uranium-supplies.html">ALTERNATIVE ENERGY BLOG - Solar-Energy-Wind-Power.com: Only 85 years of Uranium Supplies?</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/fxlacroix">fxlacroix</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/145797">1 other(s)</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/actualit%25C3%25A9s">actualités</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/themas">themas</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/energies">energies</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/uranium">uranium</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=112051">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/145797">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>