<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/tag/scotus">
<title>Public marks with tag scotus</title>
<description>Public marks with tag scotus</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/scotus</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/330124"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/176815"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/176814"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/digitalmonkey/mark/280899"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/digitalmonkey/mark/504017"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/digitalmonkey/mark/504245"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/330124">
<title>Partial-birth ban headed to Supreme Court?</title>
<link>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48617</link>
<description>With three federal appellate courts now ruling the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2004 unconstitutional, the issue likely will be decided by the newly configured Supreme Court, with two conservative justices recently appointed by President Bush.</description>
<dc:date>2006-02-02T15:04:33Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>conservative, president, abortion, scotus, pba</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48617"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/02/02/e56a2670dda12191f845a087e154ddf7.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48617">Partial-birth ban headed to Supreme Court?</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">With three federal appellate courts now ruling the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2004 unconstitutional, the issue likely will be decided by the newly configured Supreme Court, with two conservative justices recently appointed by President Bush.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/conservative">conservative</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/president">president</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/abortion">abortion</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/scotus">scotus</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/pba">pba</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=330124">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/500641">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/176815">
<title>More thoughts on Miers</title>
<link>http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/davidlimbaugh/2005/10/14/171277.html</link>
<description>I hate it when I am sympathetic to arguments on both sides of an issue as it threatens my image as a benevolently close-minded, dogmatic, doctrinaire ideologue.</description>
<dc:date>2005-10-14T12:49:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>politics, justice, news, article, conservative, miers, scotus, nomination</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/davidlimbaugh/2005/10/14/171277.html"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2005/10/14/fea02007b057f49f2735b96163060af3.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/davidlimbaugh/2005/10/14/171277.html">More thoughts on Miers</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">I hate it when I am sympathetic to arguments on both sides of an issue as it threatens my image as a benevolently close-minded, dogmatic, doctrinaire ideologue.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/politics">politics</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/justice">justice</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/news">news</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/article">article</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/conservative">conservative</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/miers">miers</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/scotus">scotus</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/nomination">nomination</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=176815">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/261361">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/176814">
<title>Miers Won't Withdraw Top Court Nod</title>
<link>http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=558&amp;e=10&amp;u=/ap/20051014/ap_on_go_su_co/miers</link>
<description>The White House is seeking the help of Republican activists in Iowa and New Hampshire to pressure GOP senators with presidential hopes to support Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers.</description>
<dc:date>2005-10-14T12:47:06Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>bush, politics, justice, article, miers, scotus, nomination, harrietmiers</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=558&amp;e=10&amp;u=/ap/20051014/ap_on_go_su_co/miers"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2005/10/14/fb1e482944884df64ccf3fce677f8f55.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=558&amp;e=10&amp;u=/ap/20051014/ap_on_go_su_co/miers">Miers Won't Withdraw Top Court Nod</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">The White House is seeking the help of Republican activists in Iowa and New Hampshire to pressure GOP senators with presidential hopes to support Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/bush">bush</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/politics">politics</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/justice">justice</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/article">article</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/miers">miers</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/scotus">scotus</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/nomination">nomination</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/harrietmiers">harrietmiers</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=176814">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/261359">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/digitalmonkey/mark/280899">
<title>Confirmation Report - OK, John, you're humble. We get the point. By Dahlia Lithwick</title>
<link>http://slate.msn.com/id/2126131/nav/tap1/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2005-09-14T12:45:44Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>digitalmonkey</dc:author>
<dc:subject>politics, law, scotus</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2126131/nav/tap1/"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2005/09/14/1c98f64e4e70abaa601537d91c7dc186.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2126131/nav/tap1/">Confirmation Report - OK, John, you're humble. We get the point. By Dahlia Lithwick</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/digitalmonkey">digitalmonkey</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/politics">politics</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/law">law</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/scotus">scotus</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=280899">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/428134">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/digitalmonkey/mark/504017">
<title>SCOTUSblog: Grokster, StreamCast Lose</title>
<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/06/grokster_stream.html</link>
<description>&quot;The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that developers of software violate federal copyright law when they provide computer users with the means to share music and movie files downloaded from the Internet [...]&quot;.</description>
<dc:date>2005-06-27T14:38:42Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>digitalmonkey</dc:author>
<dc:subject>p2p, copyright, scotus</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/06/grokster_stream.html"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2005/06/27/1f9cf506b46cd648b132d87d179230ee.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/06/grokster_stream.html">SCOTUSblog: Grokster, StreamCast Lose</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/digitalmonkey">digitalmonkey</a> 
<p class="description">"The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that developers of software violate federal copyright law when they provide computer users with the means to share music and movie files downloaded from the Internet [...]".</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/p2p">p2p</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/copyright">copyright</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/scotus">scotus</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=504017">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/769428">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/digitalmonkey/mark/504245">
<title>Supreme Court - Kelo v. New London</title>
<link>http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04-108.pdf</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2005-06-24T09:18:06Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>digitalmonkey</dc:author>
<dc:subject>property, law, scotus</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04-108.pdf"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2005/06/24/c6a8620e6b1652689ec6af9d01d4633d.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04-108.pdf">Supreme Court - Kelo v. New London</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/digitalmonkey">digitalmonkey</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/property">property</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/law">law</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/scotus">scotus</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=504245">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/769824">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>