<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/tag/google phone">
<title>Public marks with tag &quot;google phone&quot;</title>
<description>Public marks with tag &quot;google phone&quot;</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/google phone</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/srcmax/mark/1058586412"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/srcmax/mark/1058239211"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/julie/mark/1058235933"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/Gersitz/mark/1752549"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/srcmax/mark/1058586412">
<title>The Google Phone Is Very Real. And It’s Coming Soon</title>
<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/17/thegoogle-phone/</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google is building their own branded phone that they’ll sell directly and through retailers. They were long planning to have the phone be available by the holidays, but it has now slipped to early 2010. The phone will be produced by a major phone manufacturer but will only have Google branding (Microsoft did the same thing with their first Zunes, which were built by Toshiba).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
<dc:date>2009-11-19T10:42:58Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>srcmax</dc:author>
<dc:subject>google phone</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/17/thegoogle-phone/"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2009/11/19/213618a842d79d9a6525cc40f3fa0702.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/17/thegoogle-phone/">The Google Phone Is Very Real. And It’s Coming Soon</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/srcmax">srcmax</a> 
<div class="description"><blockquote>
<p>Google is building their own branded phone that they’ll sell directly and through retailers. They were long planning to have the phone be available by the holidays, but it has now slipped to early 2010. The phone will be produced by a major phone manufacturer but will only have Google branding (Microsoft did the same thing with their first Zunes, which were built by Toshiba).</p>
</blockquote></div>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/google%2Bphone">google phone</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1058586412">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3411637">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/srcmax/mark/1058239211">
<title>Google Phone : Orange prend de vitesse SFR par Neteco.com</title>
<link>http://www.neteco.com/263930-google-phone-orange-prend-vitesse-sfr.html</link>
<description>Un Google phone peut en cacher un autre. Sans doute vexé par la fin de son exclusivité sur l'iPhone d'Apple réclamée en justice puis obtenue par SFR (et Bouygues Telecom), l'opérateur Orange vient de s'offrir une jolie revanche sur son concurrent.</description>
<dc:date>2009-03-13T13:17:55Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>srcmax</dc:author>
<dc:subject>orange, actualité, google phone, téléphonie</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.neteco.com/263930-google-phone-orange-prend-vitesse-sfr.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2009/03/13/c05cff1c3cea28c915f781e0137bebb1.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.neteco.com/263930-google-phone-orange-prend-vitesse-sfr.html">Google Phone : Orange prend de vitesse SFR par Neteco.com</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/srcmax">srcmax</a> 
<p class="description">Un Google phone peut en cacher un autre. Sans doute vexé par la fin de son exclusivité sur l'iPhone d'Apple réclamée en justice puis obtenue par SFR (et Bouygues Telecom), l'opérateur Orange vient de s'offrir une jolie revanche sur son concurrent.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/orange">orange</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/actualit%25C3%25A9">actualité</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/google%2Bphone">google phone</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/t%25C3%25A9l%25C3%25A9phonie">téléphonie</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1058239211">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3125915">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/julie/mark/1058235933">
<title>Le détecteur de gays du Google Phone crée la polémique - Têtu</title>
<link>http://www.tetu.com/actualites/international/le-detecteur-de-gays-du-google-phone-cree-la-polemique-14164</link>
<description>Avec Straight, il suffit de poser la partie supérieure de son index sur l'écran de son Google Phone, pour qu'en quelques secondes le verdict tombe comme un couperet en forme de « Sorry, sweetie, you are » (Désolé, chéri,tu en es) assorti d'un joli arc-en-ciel ou, seconde option, « You are the man ! » (Tu es un mec !)</description>
<dc:date>2009-03-09T21:44:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>julie</dc:author>
<dc:subject>google phone, software, gay</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.tetu.com/actualites/international/le-detecteur-de-gays-du-google-phone-cree-la-polemique-14164"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2009/03/09/da955c8a492641de7a22812eb43082d1.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.tetu.com/actualites/international/le-detecteur-de-gays-du-google-phone-cree-la-polemique-14164">Le détecteur de gays du Google Phone crée la polémique - Têtu</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/julie">julie</a> 
<p class="description">Avec Straight, il suffit de poser la partie supérieure de son index sur l'écran de son Google Phone, pour qu'en quelques secondes le verdict tombe comme un couperet en forme de « Sorry, sweetie, you are » (Désolé, chéri,tu en es) assorti d'un joli arc-en-ciel ou, seconde option, « You are the man ! » (Tu es un mec !)</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/google%2Bphone">google phone</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/software">software</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/gay">gay</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1058235933">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3122987">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/Gersitz/mark/1752549">
<title>First Google Phone</title>
<link>http://www.searchenginecell.com/forget-orange-first-google-phone-is-a-samsung/</link>
<description>Contrary to previous beliefs, it looks like neither Orange nor HTC will have a part in producing the first “Googlephone,” and instead it seems that Samsung is slipping in the back door to steal the limelight. </description>
<dc:date>2007-01-13T18:52:40Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>Gersitz</dc:author>
<dc:subject>googlephone, google phone, google cell phone, samsung</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.searchenginecell.com/forget-orange-first-google-phone-is-a-samsung/"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2007/01/13/805fa5731b63da778cc7382d317fa19b.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.searchenginecell.com/forget-orange-first-google-phone-is-a-samsung/">First Google Phone</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/Gersitz">Gersitz</a> 
<p class="description">Contrary to previous beliefs, it looks like neither Orange nor HTC will have a part in producing the first “Googlephone,” and instead it seems that Samsung is slipping in the back door to steal the limelight. </p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/googlephone">googlephone</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/google%2Bphone">google phone</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/google%2Bcell%2Bphone">google cell phone</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/samsung">samsung</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1752549">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1516405">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>