<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/tag/follies">
<title>Public marks with tag follies</title>
<description>Public marks with tag follies</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/follies</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/Mal Burns/mark/1864721"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/Mal Burns/mark/1864721">
<title>Iraq: House of Commons Hansard Debates for 24 Jan 2007</title>
<link>http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070124/debtext/70124-0004.htm</link>
<description>This is the transcript of last week's Commons debate on Iraq - the first one it's had and also one the Prime Preacher himself refused to attend. Luckily, the bucket was on hand to stand up for government follies.

When going to this link don't think I've got it wrong. There's a brief bit on waterways and such before the debate starts around two paragraphs down. It then continues by going to &quot;next section&quot; - the expression &quot;page&quot; not seemingly known in the parliamentary language. Suffer it - you need the information!</description>
<dc:date>2007-01-27T15:09:08Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>Mal Burns</dc:author>
<dc:subject>iraq, war, uk, parliament, debate, blair, follies</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070124/debtext/70124-0004.htm"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2007/01/27/477714011eaaf7abcd1e3d90036c0f61.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070124/debtext/70124-0004.htm">Iraq: House of Commons Hansard Debates for 24 Jan 2007</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/Mal Burns">Mal Burns</a> 
<p class="description">This is the transcript of last week's Commons debate on Iraq - the first one it's had and also one the Prime Preacher himself refused to attend. Luckily, the bucket was on hand to stand up for government follies.

When going to this link don't think I've got it wrong. There's a brief bit on waterways and such before the debate starts around two paragraphs down. It then continues by going to "next section" - the expression "page" not seemingly known in the parliamentary language. Suffer it - you need the information!</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/iraq">iraq</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/war">war</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/uk">uk</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/parliament">parliament</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/debate">debate</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/blair">blair</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/follies">follies</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1864721">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1598780">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>