<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/search/usurp">
<title>Public marks with search usurp</title>
<description>Public marks with search usurp</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/search/usurp</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/282516"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/282516">
<title>FISA vs. the Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007734</link>
<description>Congress can't usurp the president's power to spy on America's enemies.

In the continuing saga of the surveillance &quot;scandal,&quot; with some congressional Democrats denouncing President Bush as a lawbreaker and even suggesting that impeachment hearings may be in order, it is important to step back and put things in historical context. First of all, the Founding Fathers knew from experience that Congress could not keep secrets. In 1776, Benjamin Franklin and his four colleagues on the Committee of Secret Correspondence unanimously concluded that they could not tell the Continental Congress about covert assistance being provided by France to the American Revolution, because &quot;we find by fatal experience that Congress consists of too many members to keep secrets.&quot;</description>
<dc:date>2005-12-29T14:22:06Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>bush, article, democrats, president</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007734"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2005/12/29/b31286cac5beea65682490da035e06c5.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007734">FISA vs. the Constitution</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">Congress can't usurp the president's power to spy on America's enemies.

In the continuing saga of the surveillance "scandal," with some congressional Democrats denouncing President Bush as a lawbreaker and even suggesting that impeachment hearings may be in order, it is important to step back and put things in historical context. First of all, the Founding Fathers knew from experience that Congress could not keep secrets. In 1776, Benjamin Franklin and his four colleagues on the Committee of Secret Correspondence unanimously concluded that they could not tell the Continental Congress about covert assistance being provided by France to the American Revolution, because "we find by fatal experience that Congress consists of too many members to keep secrets."</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/bush">bush</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/article">article</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/democrats">democrats</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/president">president</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=282516">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/430813">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>