<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/search/tilllate">
<title>Public marks with search tilllate</title>
<description>Public marks with search tilllate</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/search/tilllate</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/fastclemmy/mark/1057969611"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/camel/mark/1057922815"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/damdec/mark/1057922809"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/Tiagut/mark/2478453"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/fastclemmy/mark/1057969611">
<title>techblog.tilllate.com » Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compared</title>
<link>http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/</link>
<description>When displaying an e-mail address on a website you obviously want to obfuscate it to avoid it getting harvested by spammers. But which obfuscation method is the best one? I drove a test to find out. Here are the results:</description>
<dc:date>2008-09-02T15:35:09Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>fastclemmy</dc:author>
<dc:subject>test, javascript, email, spam</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2008/09/02/0b0592a0d228c3543bb4089b88a11bc3.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/">techblog.tilllate.com » Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compared</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/fastclemmy">fastclemmy</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2845517">2 other(s)</a> 
<p class="description">When displaying an e-mail address on a website you obviously want to obfuscate it to avoid it getting harvested by spammers. But which obfuscation method is the best one? I drove a test to find out. Here are the results:</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/test">test</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/javascript">javascript</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/email">email</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/spam">spam</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057969611">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2845517">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/camel/mark/1057922815">
<title>techblog.tilllate.com » Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compared</title>
<link>http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/</link>
<description>When displaying an e-mail address on a website you obviously want to obfuscate it to avoid it getting harvested by spammers. But which obfuscation method is the best one? I drove a test to find out. Here are the results:

In 2006 I opened nine different e-mail addresses. On this page I published the nine e-mail addresses. But every address has been obfuscated by a different method. I made sure it’s getting indexed by Google by putting a link to that page on the tilllate.com homepage.

Then I waited 1.5 years (see the original post).

For each e-mail address I counted the amount of spam I received. The amount of spam received started by 21MB (for no obfuscation and a total of over 1800 spam mails) and went down to absolutely no spam.</description>
<dc:date>2008-07-21T07:05:08Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>camel</dc:author>
<dc:subject>email, encoding, address, spam, obfuscate</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2008/09/02/0b0592a0d228c3543bb4089b88a11bc3.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/">techblog.tilllate.com » Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compared</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/camel">camel</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2845517">2 other(s)</a> 
<p class="description">When displaying an e-mail address on a website you obviously want to obfuscate it to avoid it getting harvested by spammers. But which obfuscation method is the best one? I drove a test to find out. Here are the results:

In 2006 I opened nine different e-mail addresses. On this page I published the nine e-mail addresses. But every address has been obfuscated by a different method. I made sure it’s getting indexed by Google by putting a link to that page on the tilllate.com homepage.

Then I waited 1.5 years (see the original post).

For each e-mail address I counted the amount of spam I received. The amount of spam received started by 21MB (for no obfuscation and a total of over 1800 spam mails) and went down to absolutely no spam.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/email">email</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/encoding">encoding</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/address">address</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/spam">spam</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/obfuscate">obfuscate</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057922815">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2845517">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/damdec/mark/1057922809">
<title>techblog.tilllate.com » Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compared</title>
<link>http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/</link>
<description>When displaying an e-mail address on a website you obviously want to obfuscate it to avoid it getting harvested by spammers. But which obfuscation method is the best one? I drove a test to find out. Here are the results:</description>
<dc:date>2008-07-21T06:52:51Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>damdec</dc:author>
<dc:subject>web, email, spam</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2008/09/02/0b0592a0d228c3543bb4089b88a11bc3.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/">techblog.tilllate.com » Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compared</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/damdec">damdec</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2845517">2 other(s)</a> 
<p class="description">When displaying an e-mail address on a website you obviously want to obfuscate it to avoid it getting harvested by spammers. But which obfuscation method is the best one? I drove a test to find out. Here are the results:</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/web">web</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/email">email</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/spam">spam</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057922809">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2845517">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/Tiagut/mark/2478453">
<title>tilllate Suisse - photos clubbing, agenda de soirées, chat et communauté de clubbers</title>
<link>http://ch.tilllate.com/index.php</link>
<description>Photos de soirée en Suisse.
</description>
<dc:date>2007-04-06T22:18:46Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>Tiagut</dc:author>
<dc:subject>night, photo</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://ch.tilllate.com/index.php"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2007/04/06/d1541f961cf3c5467b2ebf173a9ec166.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://ch.tilllate.com/index.php">tilllate Suisse - photos clubbing, agenda de soirées, chat et communauté de clubbers</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/Tiagut">Tiagut</a> 
<p class="description">Photos de soirée en Suisse.
</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/night">night</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/photo">photo</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=2478453">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2034071">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>