Submitted by Philip Jägenstedt (not verified) on Sun, 08/23/2009 - 14:44.

Sounds like you want a DTD or XML Schema that you can edit to your satisfaction.

Et lui, on dirait qu'il est resté dans sa grotte pendant 10 ans et qu'il n'a jamais vu XHTML M12N. En même temps, c'est un peu le cas de tous les HTML 5 fanboyz.

STEPHANIE BROWN / chicago, il / saic / cats / savory tartlets / bad haircuts / sinew, offal / 7:45am coffee doldrums / shapely eyebrows / the bering sea / food carts / when spring never breaks / seedlings / attention to detail / silver tongues / the vise-like grip of the southwest

flickr / blog

people rarely held on to money in the form of cash for any length of time, for the most part due to lack of access to banks and/or the high cost of maintaining an account proportionate to their incomes. Cash was rapidly converted to goods based on priorities and these 'goods' acted as insurance (silver), savings (buying building materials on a piecemeal basis as cashflow allowed until the house could be built), a cushion aka insurance (selling a pig for an emergency or eaten for food) and finally investment (milk bearing cow, young piglets to rear to maturity, etc).

Commissioned by the advertising agency Nordpol Hamburg, I designed the origami models and consulted the stop motion as well as the computer animators of this world wide corporate movie that tells the story of the Japanese sports brand ASICS. The movie won a Grand Prix at the Eurobest, gold at the New York festival, gold at the London International Awards, silver at the Clio in Miami and two times bronze at ADC Germany.

Commissioned by the advertising agency Nordpol Hamburg, I designed the origami models and consulted the stop motion as well as the computer animators of this world wide corporate movie that tells the story of the Japanese sports brand ASICS. The movie won a Grand Prix at the Eurobest, gold at the New York festival, gold at the London International Awards, silver at the Clio in Miami and two times bronze at ADC Germany.

In our research, we found that the most effective teams were skilled in all five styles, choosing the style that best fit the needs and goals of a project. For example, they might concurrently be involved in deep research on a User-Focused project, while relying on their experience for a Genius designed project, and spend a little time whipping out some one-shot functionality whose results would be Unintended Design.

Since the teams are working with different styles all the time, does it matter? Our research says it does. The teams that produced the best experiences knew these styles well and how to quickly switch between them. They knew when they needed to go whole hog and pull out all the stops for a User-Focused style project, while also knowing when it was important to bang out a quick design, knowing the results would essentially be unintended. Those teams had a rich toolbox of techniques and a solid understanding on how and when to use them.

There is no silver bullet.

So - what’s the use of FOAF for Social Network Portability?

Is this the silver bullet?