]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>Ce site est consacré à toutes les technologies disponibles sur la plate-forme Mozilla®, utilisée par le navigateur Mozilla Firefox™, le client mail Mozilla Thunderbird™ et les autres produits de la fondation Mozilla®. La plate-forme Mozilla® permet de développer des applications desktop ou web, fonctionnant nativement sur la plupart des systèmes d'exploitations. C'est aussi la première plate-forme vous permettant de réaliser des clients riches ou d'utiliser Firefox en tant que client riche. En effet, de l'interface graphique utilisateur reposant sur un format XML, XUL™, aux composants XPCOM réutilisables et multi plate-forme, Mozilla offre tout un ensemble de technologies, pour la plupart standardisées et relativement aisé à mettre en oeuvre : XBL, EcmaScript (Javascript 1.8), CSS, XHTML/HTML 5, SVG, XForms, MATHML, RDF, DOM, XML-RPC ... Vous pouvez commencer par une présentation de XUL.
This is (EF BB BF) C3 B6 3D 22 21 22 loaded into browsers under various labels. That happens to be properly formed ECMAScript code for all the encodings used. The bogus results for Opera9 can easily be reproduced in context of the testing script, but probably not individually from a clean cache; what's going on there is unknown. I also noted in running these tests that Opera claims "Opera supports the entire ECMA-262 2nd and 3rd standards with no exceptions" while in fact their implementation does not, the parser rejects code that follows the IdentifierStart :: UnicodeEscapeSequence production of ECMA-262 section 7.6. Instead it implements Opera-only extensions, like comma-free arrays ala [ 1 2 3 ]. Other fun facts include: IE does not implement onload for iframes and cannot modify the innerHTML or tr elements; Firefox ignores "tags" when setting the innerHTML of dynamically created tr elements with no ownerElement... Oh and Opera again needs /th "tags" so it won't nest adjacent th elements when setting innerHTML.
]]>
]]>
The announcement of Carakan, Opera's new ECMAScript Engine, using register-based bytecode instruction set. The first benchmarks show that Carakan is about two and a half times faster at the SunSpider benchmark than the ECMAScript engine in Presto 2.2 from Opera 10 Alpha.
]]>
DOM events allow event-driven programming languages like JavaScript, JScript, ECMAScript, VBScript and Java to register various event handlers/listeners on the element nodes inside a DOM tree, e.g. HTML, XHTML, XUL and SVG documents. Historically, like DOM, the event models used by various web browsers had some significant differences. This caused compatibility problems. To combat this, the event model was standardized by the W3C in DOM Level 2.
]]>
And our developer community is rightly wondering what this means. In a couple of words, not much.
]]>
This is indeed one hell of a chess game
Seeing an agreement between all of the largest players in the ECMAScript space (Mozilla, Microsoft, Apple, Opera, Google, Yahoo) is quite historic and will stand to serve users well
]]>
Ouf, on a réussi à se débarasser des namespaces et des packages en Javascript : c'est Resig, Hixie, Tantek et Sivonen qui doivent être heureux.Some ECMAScript 4 proposals have been deemed unsound for the Web, and are off the table for good: packages, namespaces and early binding. This conclusion is key to Harmony.
In essence, Adobe has shown up to the prom, but its date has stood it up. ActionScript is now not based on any standard. It is its own, proprietary, albeit open source language. Adobe is on its own island as the rest of the industry moved to some watered down version of what it could have been. I understand why this was necessary. Brenan Eich, the father of JavaScript and the primary person driving the standard certainly didn’t want it this way. But Microsoft was never going to support 4.0.
Mozilla laisse tomber Ecmascript pour l'instant.1. Focus work on ES3.1 with full collaboration of all parties, and target two interoperable implementations by early next year. 2. Collaborate on the next step beyond ES3.1, which will include syntactic extensions but which will be more modest than ES4 in both semantic and syntactic innovation.
]]>
]]>
Cette section fournit des informations sur la syntaxe, l’utilisation et des exemples de code concernant les fonctions et les propriétés globales (ces éléments n’appartenant pas à une classe ActionScript), ainsi que les directives de compilation ; pour les constantes, elle décrit les opérateurs, instructions et mots-clés utilisés dans ActionScript et définis par la spécification de langage ECMAScript (ECMA-262), version 4.
]]>
]]>