]]>
]]>
That wasn't Lauren Bacall trash tweeting on "Twilight." (Steve Granitz/RETNA LTD.USA) via kansascity.com ...
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
"Comme le précise la page officiel du projet, nanoblogger est un petit moteur de blog écrit en bash et disponible depuis la ligne de commande (la CLI cay bon mangez-en). Il utilise les outils UNIX très répandus que sont cat, sed et grep et est diffusé sous GNU Public General License."
‘Gmrun’ is a run-program utility that provides bash-like TAB completion and history, the ability to run commands in a terminal using CTRL-Enter. CTRL-R/CTRL-S may be used for history searches, similar to ‘bash’.
]]>
]]>
]]>
Lire un fichier au fur et a mesure qu'il est complété (par exemple un fichier de log) : Compter les entrées d'un répertoire sans se planter avec les noms spéciaaux (espace ...) Transformer votre souris en souris pour gaucher : Supprimer les bips en bash : Transformer les bips en flash écran en bash : Retour au comportement par défaut : Faire apparaitre tous les core dump dans /tmp et non dans le cwd du processus :
Many people use SSH to log in to remote machines, copy files around, and perform general system administration. If you want to increase your productivity with SSH, you can try a tool that lets you run commands on more than one remote machine at the same time. Parallel ssh, Cluster SSH, and ClusterIt let you specify commands in a single terminal window and send them to a collection of remote machines where they can be executed. Why you would need a utility like this when, using openSSH, you can create a file containing your commands and use a bash for loop to run it on a list of remote hosts, one at a time? One advantage of a parallel SSH utility is that commands can be run on several hosts at the same time. For a short-running task this might not matter much, but if a task needs an hour to complete and you need to run it on 20 hosts, parallel execution beats serial by a mile. Also, if you want to interactively edit the same file on multiple machines, it might be quicker to use a parallel SSH utility and edit the file on all nodes with vi rather than concoct a script to do the same edit. Many of these parallel SSH tools include support for copying to many hosts at once (a parallel version of scp) or using rsync on a collection of hosts at once. Because the parallel SSH implementations know about all the hosts in a group, some of them also offer the ability to execute a command "on one host" and will work out which host to pick using load balancing. Finally, some parallel SSH projects let you use barriers so that you can execute a collection of commands and explicitly have each node in the group wait until all the nodes have completed a stage before moving on to the next stage of processing.
]]>This tutorial provides a brief history of Bash, which indicates how the Bash shell is different than some of the other popular UNIX shells, and also provides an overview of the major features available within Bash.
]]>Often it is difficult to make the transition from procedural scripting to object-oriented programming. This article explores how to reuse knowledge from PHP, Bash, or Python scripting to transition to object-oriented programming in Python. The article also briefly touches on the appropriate use of functional programming.
]]>Often it is difficult to make the transition from procedural scripting to object-oriented programming. This article explores how to reuse knowledge from PHP, Bash, or Python scripting to transition to object-oriented programming in Python. The article also briefly touches on the appropriate use of functional programming.
]]>
# displays (somewhat accurate) hardware sensor readouts on some current macs. # works on Powerbooks
]]>
]]>