<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/search/bagle">
<title>Public marks with search bagle</title>
<description>Public marks with search bagle</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/search/bagle</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/tudorflo/mark/498420"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/misskitty4280/mark/457159"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/misskitty4280/mark/450391"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/tudorflo/mark/498420">
<title>PCWorld.com - Here We Go Again: New Bagle Variants</title>
<link>http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,121079,tk,dn060105X,00.asp</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2006-04-23T11:46:49Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>tudorflo</dc:author>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,121079,tk,dn060105X,00.asp"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/04/23/912b5dd57692aee178c147044c8d0668.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,121079,tk,dn060105X,00.asp">PCWorld.com - Here We Go Again: New Bagle Variants</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/tudorflo">tudorflo</a> 
<p class="tags">
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=498420">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/759486">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/misskitty4280/mark/457159">
<title>Security Watch: The black hole inside the Bagle virus - CNET reviews</title>
<link>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6481082-1.html?tag=nl.e757</link>
<description>The Bagle virus is not new. Since its inception in January 2004, about 188 variants have fanned out across the Internet. And although it may not be threatening your desktop or making headlines currently, Bagle is perhaps the most significant new virus to emerge within the last few years, with its authors manipulating its base code to include new and ever more dangerous payloads.</description>
<dc:date>2006-04-04T18:25:12Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>misskitty4280</dc:author>
<dc:subject>Viruses, computer-security</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6481082-1.html?tag=nl.e757"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/04/04/0181914c016df11a7875eb0f5f36c84e.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6481082-1.html?tag=nl.e757">Security Watch: The black hole inside the Bagle virus - CNET reviews</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/misskitty4280">misskitty4280</a> 
<p class="description">The Bagle virus is not new. Since its inception in January 2004, about 188 variants have fanned out across the Internet. And although it may not be threatening your desktop or making headlines currently, Bagle is perhaps the most significant new virus to emerge within the last few years, with its authors manipulating its base code to include new and ever more dangerous payloads.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Viruses">Viruses</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/computer-security">computer-security</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=457159">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/694497">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/misskitty4280/mark/450391">
<title>Bagle worm variant warns: 'Lawsuit Against You'</title>
<link>http://antivirus.about.com/od/virusdescriptions/a/baglelawsuit.htm</link>
<description>A new variant of the Bagle worm, discovered on March 2, 2006, sends an infected email claiming 'LAWSUIT AGAINST YOU' and instructing recipients to open its attached file for details. Of course, those who do open the attachment will infect their computers and begin spreading the infection to others.</description>
<dc:date>2006-03-30T18:17:38Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>misskitty4280</dc:author>
<dc:subject>Viruses</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://antivirus.about.com/od/virusdescriptions/a/baglelawsuit.htm"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/03/30/0e06ff50541e7dbbc52dee0bb2b7ad62.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://antivirus.about.com/od/virusdescriptions/a/baglelawsuit.htm">Bagle worm variant warns: 'Lawsuit Against You'</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/misskitty4280">misskitty4280</a> 
<p class="description">A new variant of the Bagle worm, discovered on March 2, 2006, sends an infected email claiming 'LAWSUIT AGAINST YOU' and instructing recipients to open its attached file for details. Of course, those who do open the attachment will infect their computers and begin spreading the infection to others.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Viruses">Viruses</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=450391">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/683503">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>