<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/search/amendment">
<title>Public marks with search amendment</title>
<description>Public marks with search amendment</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/search/amendment</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/mbertier/mark/1057767857"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/WebAPP/mark/1057710984"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/springnet/mark/1057900348"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/sbrothier/mark/1057488786"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/kruty/mark/1057488526"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/lukeslytalker/mark/1057454688"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/edfmedia/mark/2540017"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/efink/mark/2393940"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/efink/mark/2393979"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/efink/mark/2394072"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/RoseD1/mark/1326043"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/1048345"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/758325"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/726962"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jey/mark/1462493"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668726"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jessebuck/mark/534891"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/multilinko/mark/494840"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668878"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668967"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668968"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668969"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668974"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/443609"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/440363"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/mbertier/mark/1057767857">
<title>Administration Asserts No Fourth Amendment for Domestic Military Operations | Electronic Frontier Foundation</title>
<link>http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/04/administration-asserts-no-fourth-amendment-domestic-military-operations</link>
<description>In short, it appears that the Administration may view NSA domestic surveillance, including the surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans detailed in EFF's Hepting case, as a &quot;domestic military operation.&quot; If so, this Yoo memo would blow a loophole in the Fourth Amendment big enough to fit all of our everyday telephone calls, web searches, instant messages and emails through.</description>
<dc:date>2008-04-02T20:13:13Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>mbertier</dc:author>
<dc:subject>monde2merde, usa, surveillance</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/04/administration-asserts-no-fourth-amendment-domestic-military-operations"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/04/administration-asserts-no-fourth-amendment-domestic-military-operations">Administration Asserts No Fourth Amendment for Domestic Military Operations | Electronic Frontier Foundation</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/mbertier">mbertier</a> 
<p class="description">In short, it appears that the Administration may view NSA domestic surveillance, including the surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans detailed in EFF's Hepting case, as a "domestic military operation." If so, this Yoo memo would blow a loophole in the Fourth Amendment big enough to fit all of our everyday telephone calls, web searches, instant messages and emails through.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/monde2merde">monde2merde</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/usa">usa</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/surveillance">surveillance</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057767857">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2728125">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/WebAPP/mark/1057710984">
<title>Killing the 1st Amendment planned--Fairness Doct</title>
<link>http://hearmythunder.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi?action=forum&amp;board=elections&amp;op=display&amp;num=412&amp;start=0</link>
<description>Prepare for a major, frontal assault on the First Amendment – perhaps the worst in American history. </description>
<dc:date>2008-02-24T22:15:58Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>WebAPP</dc:author>
<dc:subject>plitics</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://hearmythunder.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi?action=forum&amp;board=elections&amp;op=display&amp;num=412&amp;start=0"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://hearmythunder.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi?action=forum&amp;board=elections&amp;op=display&amp;num=412&amp;start=0">Killing the 1st Amendment planned--Fairness Doct</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/WebAPP">WebAPP</a> 
<p class="description">Prepare for a major, frontal assault on the First Amendment – perhaps the worst in American history. </p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/plitics">plitics</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057710984">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2681961">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/springnet/mark/1057900348">
<title>Amendment-backer dogged Domain deal from the start</title>
<link>http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/12/31/1231rodgers.html</link>
<description>Brian Rodgers is no City Hall mover and shaker.  But he has nonetheless shaken things up with his crusade to stop the tax subsidies that Austin granted to the high-end Domain shopping center in 2003.</description>
<dc:date>2008-02-21T14:08:11Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>springnet</dc:author>
<dc:subject>*****, springnet, business, shopping, domain, politics, texas, austin, springnet blogmarks</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/12/31/1231rodgers.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/12/31/1231rodgers.html">Amendment-backer dogged Domain deal from the start</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/springnet">springnet</a> 
<p class="description">Brian Rodgers is no City Hall mover and shaker.  But he has nonetheless shaken things up with his crusade to stop the tax subsidies that Austin granted to the high-end Domain shopping center in 2003.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/%252A%252A%252A%252A%252A">*****</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/springnet">springnet</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/business">business</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/shopping">shopping</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/domain">domain</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/politics">politics</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/texas">texas</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/austin">austin</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/springnet%2Bblogmarks">springnet blogmarks</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057900348">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2825882">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/sbrothier/mark/1057488786">
<title>22nd Amendment</title>
<link>http://www.andrewsloat.com/work/22ndamendment/index.html</link>
<description>© Andrew Sloat
Music: “improv1” from Ptolemy's Guitar by Roland Satterwhite </description>
<dc:date>2007-10-16T19:27:06Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>sbrothier</dc:author>
<dc:subject>typography, video, motiondesign, politics</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.andrewsloat.com/work/22ndamendment/index.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.andrewsloat.com/work/22ndamendment/index.html">22nd Amendment</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/sbrothier">sbrothier</a> 
<p class="description">© Andrew Sloat
Music: “improv1” from Ptolemy's Guitar by Roland Satterwhite </p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/typography">typography</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/video">video</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/motiondesign">motiondesign</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/politics">politics</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057488786">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2480773">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/kruty/mark/1057488526">
<title>22nd Amendment on Vimeo</title>
<link>http://vimeo.com/341055</link>
<description>un bon split screen. typo.</description>
<dc:date>2007-10-16T14:38:28Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>kruty</dc:author>
<dc:subject>motion, video</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://vimeo.com/341055"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2007/10/16/c640bfd64417d92ff369ccd01095e264.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://vimeo.com/341055">22nd Amendment on Vimeo</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/kruty">kruty</a> 
<p class="description">un bon split screen. typo.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/motion">motion</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/video">video</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057488526">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2480500">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/lukeslytalker/mark/1057454688">
<title>Morse v. Frederick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
<link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_v._Frederick</link>
<description>Morse, et al. v. Frederick, 551 U.S. ___ (2007), was a First Amendment student free speech case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a principal may, consistent with the First Amendment, restrict student speech at a school event w...</description>
<dc:date>2007-06-28T12:31:08Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>lukeslytalker</dc:author>
<dc:subject>wikipedia</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_v._Frederick"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_v._Frederick">Morse v. Frederick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/lukeslytalker">lukeslytalker</a> 
<p class="description">Morse, et al. v. Frederick, 551 U.S. ___ (2007), was a First Amendment student free speech case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a principal may, consistent with the First Amendment, restrict student speech at a school event w...</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/wikipedia">wikipedia</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1057454688">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2451847">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/edfmedia/mark/2540017">
<title>A Look Inside the 2nd Annual OKC Tattoo Convention</title>
<link>http://www.oklahomaink.com/articles/a_look_inside_2nd_annual_okc_tattoo_convention.php</link>
<description>An indepth look into the upcoming 2nd annual okc tattoo convention hosted by chris brady of fatco - first amendment tattoo company.</description>
<dc:date>2007-04-13T21:29:09Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>edfmedia</dc:author>
<dc:subject>tattoo, oklahoma, convention, fatco</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.oklahomaink.com/articles/a_look_inside_2nd_annual_okc_tattoo_convention.php"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2007/04/13/5318cf7c1613798268e0e256d13e1b0a.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.oklahomaink.com/articles/a_look_inside_2nd_annual_okc_tattoo_convention.php">A Look Inside the 2nd Annual OKC Tattoo Convention</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/edfmedia">edfmedia</a> 
<p class="description">An indepth look into the upcoming 2nd annual okc tattoo convention hosted by chris brady of fatco - first amendment tattoo company.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/tattoo">tattoo</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/oklahoma">oklahoma</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/convention">convention</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/fatco">fatco</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=2540017">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/2082433">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/efink/mark/2393940">
<title>PrawfsBlawg: Public Schools as First Amendment Institutions?</title>
<link>http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/03/public_schools_.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2007-03-21T17:48:48Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>efink</dc:author>
<dc:subject>law-constitutional, debris</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/03/public_schools_.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/03/public_schools_.html">PrawfsBlawg: Public Schools as First Amendment Institutions?</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/efink">efink</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/law-constitutional">law-constitutional</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/debris">debris</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=2393940">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1972331">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/efink/mark/2393979">
<title>Balkinization: The Second Amendment is Back, Baby!</title>
<link>http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/03/second-amendment-is-back-baby-parker-v.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2007-03-12T18:19:12Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>efink</dc:author>
<dc:subject>law-constitutional, debris</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/03/second-amendment-is-back-baby-parker-v.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/03/second-amendment-is-back-baby-parker-v.html">Balkinization: The Second Amendment is Back, Baby!</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/efink">efink</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/law-constitutional">law-constitutional</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/debris">debris</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=2393979">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1972369">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/efink/mark/2394072">
<title>PrawfsBlawg: Universities as First Amendment Institutions: Some Easy Answers and Hard Questions</title>
<link>http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/03/universities_as.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2007-03-01T15:28:11Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>efink</dc:author>
<dc:subject>debris, legal, law-constitutional</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/03/universities_as.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/03/universities_as.html">PrawfsBlawg: Universities as First Amendment Institutions: Some Easy Answers and Hard Questions</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/efink">efink</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/debris">debris</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/legal">legal</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/law-constitutional">law-constitutional</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=2394072">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1972460">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/RoseD1/mark/1326043">
<title>US Schools Given Power To Strip Search Students</title>
<link>http://www.starttherevolution.org/archives/2006/j%20-%20october/USSchoolsGivenPowerToStripSearchStudents.htm</link>
<description>US schools are going to be allowed to strip-search your children if they have &quot;reasonable suspicion&quot; to believe that they may be carrying weapons, drugs or &quot;dangerous substances,&quot;  Of course, having recently raped the Fourth Amendment,anyway, Congress c</description>
<dc:date>2006-11-30T09:48:37Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>RoseD1</dc:author>
<dc:subject>Big-brother-gone-insane</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.starttherevolution.org/archives/2006/j%20-%20october/USSchoolsGivenPowerToStripSearchStudents.htm"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.starttherevolution.org/archives/2006/j%20-%20october/USSchoolsGivenPowerToStripSearchStudents.htm">US Schools Given Power To Strip Search Students</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/RoseD1">RoseD1</a> 
<p class="description">US schools are going to be allowed to strip-search your children if they have "reasonable suspicion" to believe that they may be carrying weapons, drugs or "dangerous substances,"  Of course, having recently raped the Fourth Amendment,anyway, Congress c</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Big-brother-gone-insane">Big-brother-gone-insane</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1326043">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1322801">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/1048345">
<title>School Officials Threaten Seventh Grader for Reading Bible</title>
<link>http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=639</link>
<description>Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute have filed a civil rights lawsuit in defense of the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of a seventh grader who was ordered by Maryland middle school officials to stop reading her Bible during free time at school or face disciplinary action. Institute attorneys have asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland to declare that prohibiting students from reading Bibles or other religious texts during their free time is unconstitutional.</description>
<dc:date>2006-10-03T20:29:19Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>court, school, religious, stop, free, lawsuit, bible</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=639"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/10/03/8a62cb7ea496f93ac9fdf27c8f18fe5c.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=639">School Officials Threaten Seventh Grader for Reading Bible</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute have filed a civil rights lawsuit in defense of the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of a seventh grader who was ordered by Maryland middle school officials to stop reading her Bible during free time at school or face disciplinary action. Institute attorneys have asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland to declare that prohibiting students from reading Bibles or other religious texts during their free time is unconstitutional.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/court">court</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/school">school</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/religious">religious</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/stop">stop</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/free">free</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/lawsuit">lawsuit</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/bible">bible</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1048345">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1152062">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/758325">
<title>ACLU Accused of Profiting at Taxpayer Expense</title>
<link>http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200608/CUL20060804a.html</link>
<description>The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is guilty of &quot;judicial blackmail,&quot; according to the American Legion, which is pushing for congressional legislation to end one of the ACLU's streams of revenue.

Judges would be stripped of the authority to award attorney fees to the ACLU and similar groups in cases involving the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment Establishment Clause, if the American Legion gets its way.</description>
<dc:date>2006-08-07T15:17:34Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>american, aclu, liberties</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200608/CUL20060804a.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/08/07/4c49b41767ff96c41dd46804bb57554a.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200608/CUL20060804a.html">ACLU Accused of Profiting at Taxpayer Expense</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is guilty of "judicial blackmail," according to the American Legion, which is pushing for congressional legislation to end one of the ACLU's streams of revenue.

Judges would be stripped of the authority to award attorney fees to the ACLU and similar groups in cases involving the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment Establishment Clause, if the American Legion gets its way.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/american">american</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/aclu">aclu</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/liberties">liberties</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=758325">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1012170">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/726962">
<title>8 Employees Stabbed at Tenn. Grocery Store</title>
<link>http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2223323</link>
<description>A knife-wielding grocery store employee attacked eight co-workers Friday, seriously injuring four before a witness pulled a gun and stopped him, police said.

Elartrice Ingram, 21, was charged with nine counts of attempted first-degree murder, police said. The attack apparently stemmed from a work dispute, investigators said.

()() One more example of why we need to keep the 2nd Amendment and Castle Doctrine laws.</description>
<dc:date>2006-07-24T19:51:01Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>police, work</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2223323"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/07/24/707862168c8b452892a48f2b8ef17272.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2223323">8 Employees Stabbed at Tenn. Grocery Store</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">A knife-wielding grocery store employee attacked eight co-workers Friday, seriously injuring four before a witness pulled a gun and stopped him, police said.

Elartrice Ingram, 21, was charged with nine counts of attempted first-degree murder, police said. The attack apparently stemmed from a work dispute, investigators said.

()() One more example of why we need to keep the 2nd Amendment and Castle Doctrine laws.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/police">police</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/work">work</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=726962">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/993488">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jey/mark/1462493">
<title>The First Amendment is Dead | TPMCafe</title>
<link>http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/jul/16/the_first_amendment_is_dead</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2006-07-21T19:21:03Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jey</dc:author>
<dc:subject>FreedomOfSpeech, law</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/jul/16/the_first_amendment_is_dead"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/jul/16/the_first_amendment_is_dead">The First Amendment is Dead | TPMCafe</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jey">jey</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/FreedomOfSpeech">FreedomOfSpeech</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/law">law</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1462493">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/1418849">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668726">
<title>05.18.06 HI: Akaka calls Senate attention to Filipino Veterans' hardship during immigration debate</title>
<link>http://www.molokaitimes.com/articles/651811173.asp</link>
<description>Washington, D.C. - The U.S. Senate today unanimously accepted an amendment offered by Senator Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI) to grant the children of Filipino World War II veterans special immigrant status for purposes of family reunification.  The generation o</description>
<dc:date>2006-06-08T15:52:13Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>aflciopolitical</dc:author>
<dc:subject>news, Akaka, SenateRaces, hi</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.molokaitimes.com/articles/651811173.asp"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.molokaitimes.com/articles/651811173.asp">05.18.06 HI: Akaka calls Senate attention to Filipino Veterans' hardship during immigration debate</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/aflciopolitical">aflciopolitical</a> 
<p class="description">Washington, D.C. - The U.S. Senate today unanimously accepted an amendment offered by Senator Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI) to grant the children of Filipino World War II veterans special immigrant status for purposes of family reunification.  The generation o</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/news">news</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Akaka">Akaka</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/SenateRaces">SenateRaces</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/hi">hi</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=668726">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/947911">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jessebuck/mark/534891">
<title>Dum Vivo Cano -- Students Sue to Protect Hate Speech</title>
<link>http://www.dumvivocano.com/?p=223</link>
<description>In Pennsylvania a group of 3 students is suing the school district saying that their First Amendment rights are being violated because they are unable to harass gay students with hate speech.</description>
<dc:date>2006-05-03T12:35:44Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jessebuck</dc:author>
<dc:subject>gay, christian, students, glbt, lawsuits, harassment</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.dumvivocano.com/?p=223"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/05/03/46c9dc489b7459e283785d216480ccfd.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.dumvivocano.com/?p=223">Dum Vivo Cano -- Students Sue to Protect Hate Speech</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jessebuck">jessebuck</a> 
<p class="description">In Pennsylvania a group of 3 students is suing the school district saying that their First Amendment rights are being violated because they are unable to harass gay students with hate speech.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/gay">gay</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/christian">christian</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/students">students</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/glbt">glbt</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/lawsuits">lawsuits</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/harassment">harassment</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=534891">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/825507">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/multilinko/mark/494840">
<title>Slashdot | Tilting At Windmills</title>
<link>http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/21/202213</link>
<description>Anne Applebaum writes in the Washington Post about environmentalists who are opposing renewable energy sources.&quot; From the article: &quot;Already, activists and real estate developers have stalled projects across Pennsylvania, West Virginia and New York. In Western Maryland, a proposal to build wind turbines alongside a coal mine, on a heavily logged mountaintop next to a transmission line, has just been nixed by state officials who called it too environmentally damaging. Along the coast of Nantucket, Mass. -- the only sufficiently shallow spot on the New England coast -- a coalition of anti-wind groups and summer homeowners, among them the Kennedy family, also seems set to block Cape Wind, a planned offshore wind farm. Their well-funded lobbying last month won them the attentions of Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska), who, though normally an advocate of a state's right to its own resources, has made an exception for Massachusetts and helped pass an amendment designed to kill the project altogether.</description>
<dc:date>2006-04-21T22:48:57Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>multilinko</dc:author>
<dc:subject>energy, wind, renewable</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/21/202213"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/04/22/936c74233e618dbef6bc3a94c3bc1862.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/21/202213">Slashdot | Tilting At Windmills</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/multilinko">multilinko</a> 
<p class="description">Anne Applebaum writes in the Washington Post about environmentalists who are opposing renewable energy sources." From the article: "Already, activists and real estate developers have stalled projects across Pennsylvania, West Virginia and New York. In Western Maryland, a proposal to build wind turbines alongside a coal mine, on a heavily logged mountaintop next to a transmission line, has just been nixed by state officials who called it too environmentally damaging. Along the coast of Nantucket, Mass. -- the only sufficiently shallow spot on the New England coast -- a coalition of anti-wind groups and summer homeowners, among them the Kennedy family, also seems set to block Cape Wind, a planned offshore wind farm. Their well-funded lobbying last month won them the attentions of Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska), who, though normally an advocate of a state's right to its own resources, has made an exception for Massachusetts and helped pass an amendment designed to kill the project altogether.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/energy">energy</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/wind">wind</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/renewable">renewable</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=494840">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/754526">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668878">
<title>04.06.06 ME: House, Senate disagree on minimum wage bill - A.J. Higgins</title>
<link>http://www.bangornews.com/news/templates/?a=131711</link>
<description>AUGUSTA - A bill to increase the minimum wage to $7 an hour by Oct. 1, 2007, ran into trouble Wednesday when the House voted 74-66 for an amendment that reduced the increase and delayed its implementation. After defeating an identical amendment presented</description>
<dc:date>2006-04-06T13:23:40Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>aflciopolitical</dc:author>
<dc:subject>MinimumWage, Maine, LaborLegislation, news</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.bangornews.com/news/templates/?a=131711"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.bangornews.com/news/templates/?a=131711">04.06.06 ME: House, Senate disagree on minimum wage bill - A.J. Higgins</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/aflciopolitical">aflciopolitical</a> 
<p class="description">AUGUSTA - A bill to increase the minimum wage to $7 an hour by Oct. 1, 2007, ran into trouble Wednesday when the House voted 74-66 for an amendment that reduced the increase and delayed its implementation. After defeating an identical amendment presented</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/MinimumWage">MinimumWage</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Maine">Maine</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/LaborLegislation">LaborLegislation</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/news">news</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=668878">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/948062">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668967">
<title>Give Arkansas a Raise Now</title>
<link>http://www.givearkansasaraisenow.org/</link>
<description>Coalition proposing a constitutional amendment that would increase the minimum wage in Arkansas by $1 an hour (from $5.15 to $6.15) effective January 1, 2007. Starting January 1, 2008, and each January 1 thereafter, the minimum wage would be adjusted base</description>
<dc:date>2006-03-29T20:50:46Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>aflciopolitical</dc:author>
<dc:subject>Arkansas, MinimumWage, ActivistGroups, IssueCampaigns</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.givearkansasaraisenow.org/"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.givearkansasaraisenow.org/">Give Arkansas a Raise Now</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/aflciopolitical">aflciopolitical</a> 
<p class="description">Coalition proposing a constitutional amendment that would increase the minimum wage in Arkansas by $1 an hour (from $5.15 to $6.15) effective January 1, 2007. Starting January 1, 2008, and each January 1 thereafter, the minimum wage would be adjusted base</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Arkansas">Arkansas</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/MinimumWage">MinimumWage</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/ActivistGroups">ActivistGroups</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/IssueCampaigns">IssueCampaigns</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=668967">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/948152">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668968">
<title>03.28.06 AR: Solons get behind plan to increase minimum wage</title>
<link>http://www.baxterbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060328/OPINION01/603280308/1014/OPINION</link>
<description>If Gov. Mike Huckabee gets a special legislative session rolling by April 3, lawmakers may head off a constitutional amendment to raise Arkansas' minimum wage by increasing it themselves. A compromise minimum wage plan could be included on the agenda for</description>
<dc:date>2006-03-29T20:49:34Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>aflciopolitical</dc:author>
<dc:subject>Arkansas, MinimumWage, news</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.baxterbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060328/OPINION01/603280308/1014/OPINION"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.baxterbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060328/OPINION01/603280308/1014/OPINION">03.28.06 AR: Solons get behind plan to increase minimum wage</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/aflciopolitical">aflciopolitical</a> 
<p class="description">If Gov. Mike Huckabee gets a special legislative session rolling by April 3, lawmakers may head off a constitutional amendment to raise Arkansas' minimum wage by increasing it themselves. A compromise minimum wage plan could be included on the agenda for</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Arkansas">Arkansas</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/MinimumWage">MinimumWage</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/news">news</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=668968">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/948153">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668969">
<title>03.29.06 ME: Approval for Minimum Wage Increase Pending</title>
<link>http://www.mainelincolncountynews.com/index.cfm?ID=17806</link>
<description>A bill to raise the current minimum wage of $6.50 to $6.75 this October and then to $7 in October of 2007 appears to be on its way to final approval after the Senate this week rejected an amendment to add a training wage to the proposal. The amendment, pr</description>
<dc:date>2006-03-29T19:48:01Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>aflciopolitical</dc:author>
<dc:subject>MinimumWage, Maine, news</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.mainelincolncountynews.com/index.cfm?ID=17806"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.mainelincolncountynews.com/index.cfm?ID=17806">03.29.06 ME: Approval for Minimum Wage Increase Pending</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/aflciopolitical">aflciopolitical</a> 
<p class="description">A bill to raise the current minimum wage of $6.50 to $6.75 this October and then to $7 in October of 2007 appears to be on its way to final approval after the Senate this week rejected an amendment to add a training wage to the proposal. The amendment, pr</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/MinimumWage">MinimumWage</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Maine">Maine</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/news">news</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=668969">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/948154">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/aflciopolitical/mark/668974">
<title>03.26.06 AR: Arkansas' minimum wage scenarios</title>
<link>http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2006/03/26/RobyBrock/335292.html</link>
<description>A proposed constitutional amendment to raise the minimum wage in Arkansas from $5.15 per hour to $6.15 per hour is being considered on a call for a special legislative session. A proposed amendment in Arkansas would require an annual automatic increase or</description>
<dc:date>2006-03-27T15:55:05Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>aflciopolitical</dc:author>
<dc:subject>Arkansas, MinimumWage, news</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2006/03/26/RobyBrock/335292.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/404.php" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2006/03/26/RobyBrock/335292.html">03.26.06 AR: Arkansas' minimum wage scenarios</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/aflciopolitical">aflciopolitical</a> 
<p class="description">A proposed constitutional amendment to raise the minimum wage in Arkansas from $5.15 per hour to $6.15 per hour is being considered on a call for a special legislative session. A proposed amendment in Arkansas would require an annual automatic increase or</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/Arkansas">Arkansas</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/MinimumWage">MinimumWage</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/news">news</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=668974">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/948159">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/443609">
<title>A good idea suddenly has become a bad idea</title>
<link>http://tinyurl.com/effvp</link>
<description>Earlier this week, Republican Sens. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Mike Crapo of Idaho proposed an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2007 Budget Resolution that would have created a reserve fund to protect the Social Security surplus.</description>
<dc:date>2006-03-25T19:46:40Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>carolina, south, jim, demint</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/effvp"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/03/25/87d2248de5d8eb3d5a61a3b72b508e77.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://tinyurl.com/effvp">A good idea suddenly has become a bad idea</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">Earlier this week, Republican Sens. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Mike Crapo of Idaho proposed an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2007 Budget Resolution that would have created a reserve fund to protect the Social Security surplus.</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/carolina">carolina</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/south">south</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/jim">jim</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/demint">demint</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=443609">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/672206">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jasontromm/mark/440363">
<title>Cops go to hotel bars to arrest drunk guests</title>
<link>http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49397</link>
<description>The controversial police tactic of arresting drunks at bars and restaurants has gone to a new level, to include intoxicated people at hotels, even those who are registered guests with no plans on driving.

()() This seems to be a shocking violation of peoples' civil liberties.  Don't these cops know the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th Amendment?</description>
<dc:date>2006-03-23T13:29:36Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jasontromm</dc:author>
<dc:subject>hotel, police, drunks</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49397"><img border="0" src="http://www.blogmarks.net/screenshots/2006/03/23/e5073350849fc990bad8f1b992e92b41.png" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49397">Cops go to hotel bars to arrest drunk guests</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jasontromm">jasontromm</a> 
<p class="description">The controversial police tactic of arresting drunks at bars and restaurants has gone to a new level, to include intoxicated people at hotels, even those who are registered guests with no plans on driving.

()() This seems to be a shocking violation of peoples' civil liberties.  Don't these cops know the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th Amendment?</p>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/hotel">hotel</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/police">police</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/drunks">drunks</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=440363">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/666863">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>