Public marks on http://www.w3.org/2004/05/18-atom-nyc Public marks on http://www.w3.org/2004/05/18-atom-nyc http://blogmarks.net/marks/link/442 "IETF is a black hole." Sam Ruby 18 May 2004 http://www.w3.org/2004/05/18-atom-nyc <blockquote><p>sr - sam ruby, IBM : IETF is a black hole. I'm not thrilled with them. But it has an external perception of being open.</p></blockquote> 2009-01-24T22:09:03Z karlcow atom, ietf

"IETF is a black hole." Sam Ruby 18 May 2004

by karlcow & 2 other(s)

sr - sam ruby, IBM : IETF is a black hole. I'm not thrilled with them. But it has an external perception of being open.

Copy | React (0)
]]> Minutes from Atom discussion, New York City, 18 May 2004 http://www.w3.org/2004/05/18-atom-nyc Sam Ruby : We thought about rolling it back into RSS, but that turned out to be impractical. So we moved forward. 2005-10-05T11:29:36Z tehu w3c, atom

Minutes from Atom discussion, New York City, 18 May 2004

by tehu & 2 other(s)

Sam Ruby : We thought about rolling it back into RSS, but that turned out to be impractical. So we moved forward.

Copy | React (0)
]]> Atom discussion, New York City, 18 May 2004 http://www.w3.org/2004/05/18-atom-nyc 2004-12-07T09:07:32Z François Hodierne w3c, atom

Atom discussion, New York City, 18 May 2004

by François Hodierne & 2 other(s)

Copy | React (0)
]]>