<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/marks/link/3193344">
<title>Public marks on http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html</title>
<description>Public marks on http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html</description>
<link>http://blogmarks.net/marks/link/3193344</link>
<items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jeanruaud/mark/1058343214"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/karlcow/mark/1058320448"/>
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/jeanruaud/mark/1058343214">
<title>Goodreads vs Twitter: The Benefits of Asymmetric Follow - O'Reilly Radar</title>
<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:date>2009-05-11T21:00:17Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>jeanruaud</dc:author>
<dc:subject>social, socialsoftware</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2009/05/11/2b104a49f2581a4b4202460fe700c002.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html">Goodreads vs Twitter: The Benefits of Asymmetric Follow - O'Reilly Radar</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/jeanruaud">jeanruaud</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3193344">1 other(s)</a> 
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/social">social</a>
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/socialsoftware">socialsoftware</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1058343214">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3193344">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> <item rdf:about="http://blogmarks.net/api/user/karlcow/mark/1058320448">
<title>Goodreads vs Twitter: The Benefits of Asymmetric Follow - O'Reilly Radar</title>
<link>http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Asymmetric follow should at least be an option on any social network. It’s the way the world really works. We never find ourselves in clearly delineated friend-circles, where everyone has or wants complete visibility with everyone else, or none at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
<dc:date>2009-05-11T10:23:06Z</dc:date>
<dc:author>karlcow</dc:author>
<dc:subject>socialnetwork</dc:subject>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mark">
<a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html"><img border="0" src="http://blogmarks.net/screenshots/2009/05/11/2b104a49f2581a4b4202460fe700c002.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div class="xfolkentry">
<h4><a class="taggedlink" href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/05/goodreads-vs-twitter-asymmetric-follow.html">Goodreads vs Twitter: The Benefits of Asymmetric Follow - O'Reilly Radar</a></h4>
 
by <a href="http://blogmarks.net/user/karlcow">karlcow</a> 
 &amp; <a class="public" href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3193344">1 other(s)</a> 
<div class="description"><blockquote><p>Asymmetric follow should at least be an option on any social network. It’s the way the world really works. We never find ourselves in clearly delineated friend-circles, where everyone has or wants complete visibility with everyone else, or none at all.</p></blockquote></div>
<p class="tags">
<a rel="tag" class="tag public_tag" href="http://blogmarks.net/marks/tag/socialnetwork">socialnetwork</a>
</p>
<div class="action-bar">
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/my/marks,new?id=1058320448">Copy</a> | 
<a href="http://blogmarks.net/link/3193344">React (0)</a></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item> </rdf:RDF>